Several Americans feel that most government officials are corrupt
and abuse their powers and privileges. Almost all United States
citizens can argue that partisan politics get in the way of creating real
change within our government. Well, for a refreshing change in Washington,
Republicans and Democrats are working together on a bipartisan bill! Yes, you
heard it correctly; the right and left are finally collaborating to stop
insider trading, which will ultimately ensure that officials are not taking
advantage of their political influence for unjust capital gains.
The
Republican-proposed bill to stop insider trading is fittingly called the STOCK
(Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge) Act, and on Monday January 30, 2012 the
US Senate Committee voted on it, and the full vote is closely approaching.
Basically,
this bill would prevent Congressional officials (members of Congress, their
spouse, and their staff) from using nonpublic information (knowledge that they
have acquired behind closed doors) for personal benefit. It would require all
members of Congress to file and disclose all of their financial transactions of
stocks, bonds, commodities, and securities within 30 days on their online
website.
Republicans
and Democrats alike are pushing for the act to go even further—to apply the act
to the Executive branch as well! Our government was founded on checks and balances, and not
only will this bill “check” the Senate and the House of Representatives, it
should apply to the President and Vice President too in order to keep the
powers of the branches balanced.
One
Democrat, Sherrod Brown, wants it to be completely illegal for members of
Congress to hold stocks. I personally think that this is too extreme, as
government officials should have the right to hold stocks like the rest of
America, however, they should not be allowed to use insider information.
In
President Obama’s State of the Union Address, he claimed he would
sign a bill that bans insider trading, hopefully, STOCK will be passed by both
the House and Senate and signed by the President himself.
If
a law, STOCK would help restore America’s faith in their government, add legitimacy
to the “rules of the game”, rejuvenate the belief that politicians are on the
same level playing field when it comes to Wall Street, and would instill the
pertinent message the politics is the business of public service—not profit.
All of this is well and good, but even if passed, how do the
people know that Congress is not getting unfair tips and knowledge about the
market? I propose that a committee be formed to enforce the law (when it comes
into action which will most likely occur) and investigate in such matters. After
all, this is a government of the people, by the people, and for the people and
we should not let the pursuit of happiness and profit of some corrupt politicians
tarnish the legitimacy of American politics.
This was so informative! Although I learned a lot from your post, I think the STOCK Act shouldn't be needed at all. As a country, we put all our trust in the leaders and the fact that they would deceive us is just wrong! Thanks for sharing!
ReplyDeleteI didn't know that the Democrats and Republicans actually knew how to work together. Glad you wrote about this topic. I have been really behind the times with Washintonian (no that is not a word, I'm aware) news lately.
ReplyDeleteI'm really glad to hear that Republicans and Democrats are working together on something! The STOCK Act is completely necessary.
ReplyDelete-Taylor M. McCarty
Indeed I think that banning politicians from having stocks is too far. They are still citizens. STOCK sounds good though I have little knowledge on stocks. In fact most Americans probably are in the same boat as me in terms of stock knowledge. If STOCK were not proposed I do not think people would be outraged due to this lack of knowledge.
ReplyDelete